Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Canadian River Gas Co. v. Terrell

District Court, W.D. Texas

Decided June 22, 1933No. 446, 445, 444PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McMILLAN, District Judge.

These three eases originated with the filing of separate bills in equity by the three complainants for the purpose of enjoining the enforcement of certain sections of chapters 26 and 28 of the Acts of the Forty-Second Legislature of the state of Texas (1931)' 1st Called Sess., relating to oil and gas, and a certain order of the Railroad Commission of Texas passed on December 30, 1932, in alleged pursuance of said statutes.

A temporary restraining order was granted by the District Judge in each ease, and, the validity of the statutes and order being assailed under the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Champlin Rfg. Co. v. Corporation Commission of OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Stephens County v. Mid-Kansas Oil & Gas Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Prendergast v. New York Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
  4. Porter v. Investors SyndicateSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  5. Houston & Texas Central Railroad v. EastTexas Supreme Court · 1904

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Burford v. Sun Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Thompson v. Consolidated Gas Utilities Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  3. Consolidated Gas Utilities Corporation v. ThompsonDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1936
  4. Sneed v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1935
  5. Texas Panhandle Gas Co. v. ThompsonDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1935

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API