Houston & Texas Central Railroad v. East
Texas Supreme Court
Error to the Court of Civil Appeals for the Fifth District, in an appeal from Grayson County. Bast sued the railway company and judgment went for defendant. Bast appealed and the judgment was reversed and rendered in his favor on the findings of fact made by the trial court. The defendant company 'then obtained writ of error from the Supreme Court.
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAMS, Associate Justice.
This case is thus stated by the Court of Civil Appeals:
“This is a suit by W. A. East against the Houston and Texas Central Railroad Company for damages growing out of the alleged destruction by defendant of plaintiff’s well. The case was tried before the court without a jury and resulted in a judgment for defendant and plaintiff appealed. The trial court filed conclusions of fact which, in the absence of a statement of facts, are to be taken as the facts of the ease. Said conclusions are as follows:
“ ‘1. The defendant, the Houston & Texas Central Railroad Company,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Pixley v. . ClarkNew York Court of Appeals · 1866
- Miller v. Black Rock Springs Improvement Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1901
- Hougan v. Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1872
- Farmer v. Stillwater Water Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
3Cited by81 opinions
- Barshop v. Medina County Underground Water Conservation DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1996
- Stephens County v. Mid-Kansas Oil & Gas Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1923
- Brown v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1935
- Thompson v. Consolidated Gas Utilities Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Coastal Oil & Gas Corp. v. Garza Energy TrustTexas Supreme Court · 2008
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.