Scheuerman v. Mathison
Oregon Supreme Court
From Multnomali: Henry E. McGinn, Judge. This is an action by Jacob Scheuerman against S. Mathison and Gust Anderson, doing business as Mathison & Anderson, copartners, in which a garnishment proceeding was instituted against the Pacific Coast Casualty Company. From a judgment against the garnishee, it appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Ramsey
The Pacific Coast Casualty Company is a California corporation. The plaintiff was an employee of the firm of Mathison & Anderson, defendants herein, and, while in their employment, he received personal injuries.
On July 10, 1912, .he commenced an action against said firm in the Circuit Court of Multnomah County to recover damages for said injuries, and soon thereafter he recovered a judgment against said firm for the sum of $1,650, and the further sum of $57.25 as costs and disbursements. On January 7,.1914, an execution was issued out of said court to enforce said judgment, and it was placed…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Patterson v. AdanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
- Connolly v. BolsterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
- Clark v. Bonsal & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
- Sanders v. Frankfort Marine, Accident & Plate Glass InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1904
- Frye v. Bath Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1903
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Wikstrom v. DAVIS ET UXOregon Supreme Court · 1957
- Hudelson v. Sanders-Swafford Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1924
- Riner v. Southwestern Surety Ins.Oregon Supreme Court · 1917
- Blessing v. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1936
- H. W. Johns-Manville Co. v. AllenIdaho Supreme Court · 1923
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.