Legal Opinion

Giles v. Transit Employees Federal Credit Union

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 27, 2014No. Civil Action No. 2011-1103PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

AMY BERMAN JACKSON, United States District Judge

Plaintiff has sued her former employer, Transit Employees Federal Credit Union (hereafter “TEFCU”), for wrongful termination. In her amended complaint, plaintiff claims that defendant discriminated against her and subjected her to retaliation in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. (Count I), the District of Columbia Human Rights Act (“DCHRA”), D.C. Code § 2-1402.01 et seq. (Count II), and the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1101…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Giles v. Transit Employees Federal Credit UnionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
  2. Walden v. Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Inst.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  3. Bradley v. District of Columbia Public SchoolsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
  4. Baskerville v. CBS News Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2022
  5. Dougherty v. Cable News NetworkDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API