Legal Opinion

Furey v. Commission on Judicial Performance

California Supreme Court

Decided October 29, 1987No. L.A. 32200PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

THE COURT. *

The Commission on Judicial Performance recommended that Judge Robert H. Furey, Jr., of the Catalina Justice Court District, Los Angeles County, be removed for “wilful misconduct in office” (hereafter wilful misconduct) and “conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice that brings the judicial office into disrepute” (prejudicial conduct). (Cal. Const., art. VI, § 18, subd. (c).) The judge petitions this court for review. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 919.) As will appear, we adopt the recommendation.

The petitioner became a member of the State Bar in 1977. For somewhat…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Craig v. HarneySupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. In Re AntazoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Geiler v. Commission on Judicial QualificationsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  4. McCartney v. Commission on Judicial QualificationsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Spruance v. Commission on Judicial QualificationsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Kloepfer v. Commission on Judicial PerformanceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Broadman v. Commission on Judical PerformanceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Ryan v. Commission on Judicial PerformanceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Honorable Bruce W. Dodds v. American Broadcasting Company, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  5. Oberholzer v. Commission on Judicial PerformanceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API