Legal Opinion

Smith v. Great Altantic & Pacific Tea Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 4, 1936No. 1600PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRISSOM, Justice.

Appellant sued appellee for damages alleged to have been caused by the negligence of appellee’s store manager in permitting oil to accumulate on the floor of its store. Appellant was a clerk in appellee’s store. He alleged and testified, in substance, that in obedience to the orders of appellee’s manager he was lifting a package of groceries for one of appellee’s customers, and that while so engaged he slipped in the oil on the floor and was thereby caused to fall, from which fall he suffered serious injuries. The jury found that plaintiff’s injury was the result of an…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Rosenthal Dry Goods Co. v. HillebrandtTexas Commission of Appeals · 1928
  2. Texas & New Orleans Railroad v. ScarboroughTexas Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Breckenridge Ice & Cold Storage Co. v. HutchensCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  4. West Lumber Co. v. SmithTexas Commission of Appeals · 1927
  5. Great West Mill & Elevator Co. v. HessCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sonken-Galamba Corp. v. HillmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  2. Southern Motor Lines v. CreamerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  3. Phipps v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953
  4. Railway Express Agency, Inc. v. CoxCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1950
  5. Mender v. BryantCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API