Legal Opinion

Ramey v. SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 12, 1964No. 667PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

The judgment of compulsory nonsuit must be sustained if plaintiff’s evidence considered in the light most favorable to him fails to show any actionable negligence on defendant’s part, or if his evidence considered in the same light affirmatively shows contributory negligence on his part so clearly that no other conclusion can be reasonably drawn therefrom. Jenkins v. R. R., 258 N.C. 58, 127 S.E. 2d 778; Carter v. R. R., 256 N.C. 545, 124 S.E. 2d 561; Bundy v. Powell, 229 N.C. 707, 51 S.E. 2d 307.

The only eye witness to the actual collision was plaintiff. His evidence, considered in the light…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Bundy v. . PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  2. Northern Pacific Railroad v. FreemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  3. Harrison v. North Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  4. Godwin v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  5. Lincoln v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Clark v. RobertsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  2. Price v. Seaboard Air Line Railroad Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  3. Raper v. ByrumSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  4. Cox v. GallamoreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  5. Jernigan v. ATLANTIC COASTLINE RAILROAD COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API