Legal Opinion

Hartsell v. City of Asheville

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 30, 1914PublishedCited by 14 opinions

PetitioN to rebear this case, reported 164 N. C., 193.

1Opinion of the CourtClaRK, C. J.

"When this case was here before, 164 N. C., 193, the Court held that, there was no liability in favor of the plaintiff against Maria Beale and her husband by reason of their ownership of the lot adjoining the sidewalk on which the plaintiff slipped and fell, to her injury, and sustained the non-suit as to the city of Asheville because the plaintiff had 'failed to offer sufficient evidence of an excuse for failure to file notice within ninety days of her claim, as required by the charter of the city.

The petition to rehear does not allege any error as to Mrs. Beale and husband, and is directed…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hartsell v. City of AshevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Randolph v. City of SpringfieldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1923
  2. Hurley v. Town of BinghamUtah Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Terrell v. . WashingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  4. Dayton v. . AshevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  5. Schulstad v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API