Legal Opinion
Schulstad v. City & County of San Francisco
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 22, 1946No. Civ. 12942PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDooling, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment for defendant City and County of San Francisco entered after its demurrer to plaintiff’s complaint had been sustained without leave to amend. The complaint is one for personal injuries alleged to have been suffered by appellant on December 5, 1943, by being struck by a bus negligently operated by respondent’s employee.
The complaint alleges the presenting of a verified claim for such injuries to the controller on May 31, 1944. The San Francisco charter in section 87 requires such claims to be presented to the controller “within sixty days after the occurrence…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Farrell v. County of PlacerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Artukovich v. AstendorfCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Walden v. . City of JamestownNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
- Forsyth v. . City of OswegoNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
- Johnson v. City of GlendaleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Cruise v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Maier v. City of KetchikanAlaska Supreme Court · 1965
- Wohlgemuth v. MeyerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Dettamanti v. Lompoc Union School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Carr v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.