Legal Opinion

Widows Fund of Sudan Temple v. Umphlett

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 18, 1957No. 24PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRodmaN, J.

When the findings of fact are compared with the solemn admissions in the answer of appellant, it develops that the only facts found by the court and not admitted by appellant in her answer are the findings that she and her husband were estranged in November 1955 and the request for change of beneficiary was in writing.

We deem the finding that insured and his wife were estranged immaterial to the decision of the case; hence, any exception to the finding in that respect, even if erroneous, is harmless.

The statement in the case on appeal that the pleadings “and other documents” were submitted to…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. McDonald v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  2. Tolbert v. Mutual Benefit Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  3. Wooten v. Grand United Order of Odd FellowsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
  4. Griffin v. United Services Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  5. Parker v. . PotterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Fidelity Bankers Life Insurance v. DortchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  2. In Re Custody of StancilCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
  3. LaMarche v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2002
  4. Harrison v. WinsteadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  5. Jenkins v. BrothersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API