Legal Opinion

Parker v. . Potter

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 18, 1931PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.

It is a fundamental maxim of the common law tbat no man should take advantage of bis own wrong. Not only is the maxim based on elementary principles; it is firmly embedded in our jurisprudence, and as remarked by Broom, it admits of illustrations from every branch of legal procedure. Legal Maxims, 275. One of these illustrations is given in Anderson v. Parker, 152 N. C., 1, in which it is said that the beneficiary in a policy of insurance who has caused or procured the death of the insured under circumstances amounting to a felony will not be allowed to recover on the policy. As the Court…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. New York Mutual Life Insurance v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Perry v. StrawbridgeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1908
  3. Slocum v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
  4. Bryant v. . BryantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  5. Box v. LanierTennessee Supreme Court · 1903

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Fidelity Bankers Life Insurance v. DortchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  2. McMichael v. ProctorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  3. Apitz v. DamesOregon Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Davenport v. . PatrickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  5. De Zoteel v. Mutual Life InsuranceSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API