Legal Opinion

Webb v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 3, 1972No. 25659PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHANGLER, Chief Judge.

The question we must decide is whether an insurer which has issued an automobile liability policy protecting against injuries or death caused by an uninsured motorist may lawfully reduce benefits owing thereunder by payments made to the injured parties under the separate medical expense coverage of that policy.

The parties agree that defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company issued to intervenors Harold E. Burton and Iris Burton its policy of automobile liability insurance. The policy contained under Insuring Agreement I, “Coverage C —Medical Payments” and…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Harleysville Mutual Casualty Co. v. BlumlingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  2. Bryant v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Virginia · 1965
  3. Stephens v. Allied Mutual Insurance CompanyNebraska Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Lyon v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity CompanyUtah Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Yarrington v. ThornburgSupreme Court of Delaware · 1964

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Harrison v. MFA Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1980
  2. Erie Insurance Exchange v. HeffernanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  3. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. WebbCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  4. Forbes v. Harleysville Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
  5. Crenshaw v. Great Central Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1975

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API