Legal Opinion

State v. Elliott

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided August 31, 1994No. 20724PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LANSING, Judge.

Ray Glen Elliott appeals ■ his convictions and sentences for manufacturing a controlled substance, I.C. § 37-2732(b), and failure to affix drug tax stamps, I.C. § 63-4206(2). He argues that his constitutional right to be present at his trial was violated on the second day of trial when the court ordered that the trial continue even though Elliott was then absent. Elliott also argues that his motion to disqualify the presiding judge prior to sentencing was erroneously denied and that he should be resentenced by a different judge. We conclude that Elliott voluntarily absented…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Diaz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  4. United States v. GagnonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Crosby v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. FinneganSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  2. Pinkney v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  3. State v. GriffithIdaho Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. State v. WachholtzIdaho Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. State v. MillerIdaho Court of Appeals · 1998

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API