Legal Opinion

State v. Wachholtz

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided January 29, 1998No. 23107, 23108PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LANSING, Judge.

This is a consolidated appeal from judgments of conviction and sentences for robbery and for aggravated assault upon a law enforcement officer. With respect to the robbery conviction, appellant Michael Allen Wachholtz argues that the district court committed error in denying his motions for a mistrial and his motion to be absent from the trial because he was allegedly suffering back pain, and in admitting testimony about Wachholtz’s escape attempt. In both cases, the appellant urges that the sentences are unduly harsh. We find no error and, therefore, affirm.

I. PACTS AND…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. State v. ToohillIdaho Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Diaz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. State v. HedgerIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
  4. State v. ReinkeIdaho Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. State v. NiceIdaho Supreme Court · 1982

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hawkins v. Comparet-CassaniCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  2. People v. MarCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Weaver v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API