Legal Opinion

State v. Miller

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided February 19, 1998No. 23441PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LANSING, Chief Judge.

In this appeal, Stephen Lee Miller contends that his conviction for burglary should be set aside because his constitutional right to be present at trial was violated when the district court continued with the trial despite Miller’s failure to appear on time on the second trial day. Miller also contends that the sentence he received is unreasonable.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Miller was charged with burglary, Idaho Code Section 18-1401, after he was discovered removing copper tubing and wiring from a vacant movie theater in Boise. The case was scheduled for a two-day…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. ToohillIdaho Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Diaz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. United States v. GagnonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. State v. HernandezIdaho Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. State v. HedgerIdaho Supreme Court · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. KroppIdaho Court of Appeals · 2021
  2. State v. RuperdIdaho Court of Appeals · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API