Legal Opinion
Jeffrey Johnson v. Hewlett-Packard Company
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 5, 2013No. 11-17062UnpublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM *
Appellants Jeffrey Johnson, Jennifer Riese, James Purvis, and Shaun Simmons appeal the district court’s (1) denial of their motion to amend their complaint a fourth time, (2) denial of their request for additional discovery under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(d), and (3) grant of summary judgment in favor of Appellee Hewlett-Packard Company (“HP”). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
I
The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Appellants’ request for leave to amend their complaint a fourth time after it concluded that three of the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. HinksonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Amerisourcebergen Corporation v. Dialysist West, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Harold Hall v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Jack Allen v. City of Beverly HillsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Fresno Unified School District v. K.U.District Court, E.D. California · 2013
- Stoetzl v. State, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Carter v. JAI-PUT Enterprise Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2020
- Eric McDowell v. Penske Truck Leasing Co., L.P.District Court, C.D. California · 2024
- Erlebach v. RAJ Enterprises of Central FloridaDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2021
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.