Stoetzl v. State
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
1Opinion of the CourtRivera, J.
*1260Plaintiffs are current and former correctional peace officers who work or worked at various state correctional facilities. They brought these coordinated class actions alleging they were improperly denied pay for time they spent under their employer's control before and after their work shifts. Ruling that plaintiffs' entitlement to overtime pay is controlled by federal, rather than California, law, the trial court entered judgment for defendants.1 We shall reverse the judgment in part as to the subclass of unrepresented employees and affirm as to the subclass of represented employees.
*1261I.…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
- Sonoma County Ass'n of Retired Employees v. Sonoma CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Ghirardo v. AntonioliCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- Martinez v. CombsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- Morillion v. Royal Packing Co.California Supreme Court · 2000
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Stoetzl v. Dept. of Human ResourcesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
- Marquez v. City of Long Beach, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Marquez v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019