Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Cramer v. Wisconsin Court of Appeals

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided July 7, 2000No. 99-1089-OAPublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDavid T. Prosser, J.

¶ 1. This is an original action to determine whether the Wisconsin Prisoner Litigation Reform Act (PLRA), created by 1997 Wis. Act 133,1 applies to persons seeking certiorari review of probation revocation. Jason J. Cramer (Cramer) pursued certiorari review of a decision of the Division of Hearings ánd Appeals. He filed a complete petition 81 days after the division revoked his probation on a withheld sentence. The Circuit Court for Dane County, Stuart A. Schwartz, Judge, dismissed the petition, finding that Cramer had not complied with the 45-day filing deadline that Wis. Stat. § 893.735(2)…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Marcus Allan McIntosh v. United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
  3. David Newlin v. David W. Helman, Jesse E. Robinson v. B. Smith, James C. Griffin v. William R. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
  4. Blair-Bey v. QuickCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
  5. State Ex Rel. Johnson v. CadyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Wisconsin Citizens Concerned for Cranes & Doves v. Wisconsin Department of Natural ResourcesWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  3. State v. PetersWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Responsible Use of Rural & Agricultural Land v. Public Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
  5. State Ex Rel. Hensley v. EndicottWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API