State Ex Rel. Johnson v. Cady
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtConnor T. Hansen, J.
The principal issues presented are:
1. Petitioners’ right to a hearing at revocation.
*5452. Equal protection, in that a different procedure is provided for probation revocation in Milwaukee county than the remainder of the state.
3. If petitioner has a right to a hearing, does he also have a right to counsel ?
4. Retroactivity.
For the resolution of the issues here presented, we find no substantial difference between the three situations presented, i.e., revocation of parole of a prisoner released on mandatory parole, discretionary parole, or a criminal on probation as a result of sentence having been…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Johnson v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Mempa v. RhaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Escoe v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Missouri v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by131 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Hammermill Paper Co. v. La PlanteWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
- State Ex Rel. Flowers v. Department of Health & Social ServicesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. BorrellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992
- Forseth v. Village of SussexCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- State v. HornWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
126 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.