Harrison v. McCormick
California Supreme Court
'APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order denying a new trial. John Hunt, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
BRITT, C.
Action to recover a balance of the price of goods sold; the action was begun against John McCormick and Oscar Lewis, alleged to be partners under the name of McCormick & Lewis; plaintiff had judgment, which was reversed on appeal, for the reason that one T. A. McCormick was shown to be a co partner with said defendants and a necessary party to the action. (Harrison v. McCormick, 69 Cal. 616.) Plaintiff then amended his complaint, joining said T. A. McCormick with the former defendants, and alleging, among other things, that the contract sued upon was made with the three as copartners…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Harrison v. McCormickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Grattan v. WigginsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
- Harrison v. McCormickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Slocum v. Hooker & CatlinNew York Supreme Court · 1852
- Northern Insurance v. PotterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bogart v. George K. Porter Co.California Supreme Court · 1924
- Ciotte v. UllrichMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
- Arocena v. SawyerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- Niehaus v. C. B. Barker Const. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1916