Legal Opinion

Niehaus v. C. B. Barker Const. Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1916PublishedCited by 5 opinions

FROM SHELBY Appeal from the Chancery Court of Shelby County. —Francis Fentress, Chancellor.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Oreen

The Chickasaw Hotel Company let a contract to the C. B. Barker Construction Company to erect the Chisca Hotel in Memphis. The complainant was a subcontractor employed to do the plastering and metal lathing on the hotel building. The account of complainant not being paid, he gave notice as required by section 3540 of Shannon’s Code, providing for the lien of mechanics or materialmen, and thereafter, within ninety days, as required by the statute, he brought an attachment suit to enforce the said lien against the Chisca Hotel property. Complainant named as defendants to his bill the C. B.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Henry Miller's Heirs & Devisees v. M'IntyreSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
  2. Love v. Southern Railway Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Green v. CliffordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Casserly v. Wayne Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1900

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mellon v. American Flour & Grain Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1929
  2. Fischer Lime & Cement Co. v. KaucherTennessee Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Link v. Southeastern Greyhound LinesTennessee Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Beverly v. BeverlyOhio Court of Appeals · 1973
  5. Whitson, Admr. v. T.C. Ry. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API