Northern Insurance v. Potter
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco. The facts sufficiently appear in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcKinstry, J.
The defendant, Julius Jacobs, and George Easton, were co-partners, doing business as insurance agents, and, as such, were agents of plaintiff. In March, 1879, an account was stated between plaintiff and defendant, Jacobs and Easton, by which a balance of $2,359.02 was found due from the three to plaintiff.
In September, 1879, Jacobs and Easton paid to plaintiff on account of such balance $1,800. At the time of the payment plaintiff released Jacobs and Easton from all further claim or liability with respect to the indebtedness of them and defendant, but it was particularly specified and agreed…
2Cited by15 opinions
- Harrison v. McCormickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Williams v. ReedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Enscoe v. FletcherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
- Uhl Estate Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
- Walker Drilling Co. v. Carlew Drilling ContractorsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.