Legal Opinion

Safety National Casualty Corp. v. Pacific Employers Insurance Co.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided November 29, 1996No. S-7335PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FABE, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

This is a dispute between two insurers, one primary and the other excess. The primary insurer entered into a settlement agreement on behalf of its insured and now seeks to hold the excess insurer responsible for a share of attorney’s fees under Alaska Civil Rule 82. We hold that the excess insurer is not responsible for a portion of Rule 82 attorney’s fees.

II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

A. Background

On November 18, 1985, Norbert Brey was injured in a ear accident. Brey was allegedly riding in an infant ear seat manufactured by Spalding & Evenflo Companies, Inc.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. Underwriters at Lloyds, LondonAlaska Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Schultz v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. HarringtonAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Alaska Rural Electric Cooperative Ass'n v. INSCO Ltd.Alaska Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Fulton v. Lloyds & Institute of London Underwriting CompaniesAlaska Supreme Court · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Allstate Insurance Co. v. TeelAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Curran v. Progressive Northwestern Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Grace v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Hahn v. GEICO Choice Insurance CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Coughlin v. Government Employees Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2003

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API