Safety National Casualty Corp. v. Pacific Employers Insurance Co.
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FABE, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
This is a dispute between two insurers, one primary and the other excess. The primary insurer entered into a settlement agreement on behalf of its insured and now seeks to hold the excess insurer responsible for a share of attorney’s fees under Alaska Civil Rule 82. We hold that the excess insurer is not responsible for a portion of Rule 82 attorney’s fees.
II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS
A. Background
On November 18, 1985, Norbert Brey was injured in a ear accident. Brey was allegedly riding in an infant ear seat manufactured by Spalding & Evenflo Companies, Inc.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. Underwriters at Lloyds, LondonAlaska Supreme Court · 1988
- Schultz v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1988
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. HarringtonAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
- Alaska Rural Electric Cooperative Ass'n v. INSCO Ltd.Alaska Supreme Court · 1990
- Fulton v. Lloyds & Institute of London Underwriting CompaniesAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Allstate Insurance Co. v. TeelAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
- Curran v. Progressive Northwestern Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2001
- Grace v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
- Hahn v. GEICO Choice Insurance CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
- Coughlin v. Government Employees Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2003
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.