Legal Opinion
Schultz v. Travelers Indemnity Co.
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided May 13, 1988No. S-2143, S-2166PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Travelers Indemnity Company cross-appeals a trial court ruling that prospective Civil Rule 82 attorney’s fees based on a stipulated projected verdict were a part of Travelers’ “policy limits.” 1 We affirm based on the reasoning of the trial court:
Joseph Schultz and Thomas G. Paterson, Jr. were killed on September 17, 1982, when a plane operated by the defendants crashed into Hudson Lake near [Iliamna], Alaska. The defendants were insured by Intervenor, the Travelers Indemnity Company (Travelers) for $100,-000.00 per passenger. That insurance contract also obligated Travelers to pay…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
- Crisci v. Security InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Continental Insurance Co. v. Bayless & Roberts, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1980
- Insurance Co. of North America v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1983
- Salmine v. KnaginAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by24 opinions
- Bohna v. HUGHES, THORSNESS, GANTZAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
- Davis v. DykmanAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
- Jackson v. American Equity Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2004
- Grace v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
- Williams v. GEICO Casualty Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2013
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.