Legal Opinion

Bureerong v. Uvawas

District Court, C.D. California

Decided March 21, 1996No. CV95-5958 ABC (BQRx)PublishedCited by 113 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER RE: 1.) DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT;

2.) DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS;

3.) DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STRIKE;

4.) DEFENDANT MERVYN’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

COLLINS, District Judge.

Defendants’ motions came on regularly for hearing before this Court on March 18,1996. After reviewing the materials submitted by the parties, argument of counsel, and the case file, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:

1.) Defendants’ motion for a more definite statement is DENIED;

2.) Defendants’ motions to dismiss are GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Plaintiffs’ fourth and fifth causes of…

2Cases cited86 opinions

  1. Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  2. Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Hal Roach Studios, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Richard Feiner and Company, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  4. Cannon v. University of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. v. SperlingSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by113 opinions

  1. Doe I v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  2. Martinez v. CombsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Neilson v. Union Bank of California, N.A.District Court, C.D. California · 2003
  4. California Department of Toxic Substances Control v. Alco Pacific, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2002
  5. Neveu v. City of FresnoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2005

108 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API