Legal Opinion

Sawyer v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided December 1, 1989No. 229-88CPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NETTESHEIM, Judge.

The issue in this case before the court after argument on defendant’s motion for summary judgment is whether a military correction board in a disability review proceeding can supply the correct standard for disallowing the claim after the disability board denied the claim reciting an admittedly incorrect standard.

FACTS

Unless otherwise noted, the following facts are undisputed. Matthew H. Sawyer (“plaintiff”) began his active duty service in the United States Navy on February 3, *8611981. Plaintiff originally was assigned to the Naval facility at Coos Head, Oregon,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Service v. DullesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. David W. Heisig v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  3. Sanders v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
  4. Friedman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962
  5. Doyle v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Matthew H. Sawyer v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
  2. Chayra v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
  3. Gay v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
  4. Clifford v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
  5. Boyle v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API