Legal Opinion
Doyle v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided May 16, 1979No. 131-77; No. 275-77PublishedCited by 136 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBennett, Judge
In these consolidated cases, before us on cross-motions for summary judgment, plaintiffs, formerly commissioned officers in the United States Army Reserve (USAR), contest their release from active duty resulting from their twice having been passed over for promotion by selection boards in 1974 and 1975,1 and contend that the decision of the Army Board for the Correction of Military Records (Correction Board) in denying their claims was arbitrary, capricious, and contrary to law. They allege that defects in the composition and decision of those boards render their separation unlawful, and they…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Harrington v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Whitus v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Sanders v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by136 opinions
- Stuart Sargisson v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Hardison v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
- Edward Larry Dodson v. United States Government, Department of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Gregory C. Porter v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Pamela Lea Maier v. Verne Orr, Secretary of the Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
131 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.