Legal Opinion

State v. Payne

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 26, 2013No. WD 75666PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAREN KING MITCHELL, Presiding Judge.

Phillip Payne appeals his conviction for one count of statutory sodomy, entered pursuant to section 566.062,1 for which he was sentenced, following a jury trial, to twenty-five years’ imprisonment. Payne argues that the trial court plainly erred in submitting the verdict director, which he alleges failed to sufficiently distinguish for the jury which of the three acts of sodomy *54described by,the victim was at issue, thus violating Payne’s right to a unanimous jury verdict. But because Payne’s defense was a general denial and not an incident-specific…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. Celis-GarciaSupreme Court of Missouri · 2011
  2. State v. WurtzbergerSupreme Court of Missouri · 2001
  3. State v. BrightmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. State v. LesieurMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. State v. FincherMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Edward L. Hoeber v. State of MissouriSupreme Court of Missouri · 2016
  2. Phillip G. Payne v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. Edward L. Hoeber v. State of MissouriSupreme Court of Missouri · 2016
  4. PAUL R. ROSE, JR. v. STATE OF MISSOURIMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API