Phillip G. Payne v. State of Missouri
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtKaren King Mitchell, Judge
Phillip Payne appeals, following an evi-dentiary hearing, the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. 1 Payne claims that trial counsel provided ineffective assistance by: (1) failing to more fully cross-examine the victim; and (2) advising Payne not to testify at trial. The motion court rejected Payne’s claims. Finding no error, we affirm.
Background
Following a jury trial, Payne was convicted of one count of statutory sodomy, 2 for which he was sentenced to twenty-five years’ imprisonment. State v. Payne, 414 S.W.3d 52, 53 (Mo. App. W.D. 2013), abrogated by Hoeber v.…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Zink v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
- Worthington v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2005
- State v. TwenterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2013
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- McGuire v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
- WILLIAM E. COPHER, Movant-Appellant v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-RespondentMissouri Court of Appeals · 2019
- Anthony Balbirnie v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2022
- Brad Lindsey v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2024
- Christopher J. Potter v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2023
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.