PAUL R. ROSE, JR. v. STATE OF MISSOURI
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAM W. FRANCIS, JR., J.—
OPINION AUTHOR
Paul R. Rose, Jr. (“Rose”), appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying his amended Rule 29.15 1 motion asserting ineffective assistance of counsel for failure to object to a verdict director. Rose challenges the judgment of the motion court in one point on appeal. Finding merit to Rose’s point, we reverse the judgment of the motion court and remand for further proceedings.
Facts and Procedural History
We set forth only those facts necessary to complete our review. We may consider only those facts alleged by Rose in his amended motion and not…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Deck v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002
- McLaughlin v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012
- State v. Celis-GarciaSupreme Court of Missouri · 2011
- State v. HadleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.