Legal Opinion
State v. Parham
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided April 4, 1978PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHouse, C. J.
On a trial to a jury, the defendant was found guilty of the crimes of burglary in the first degree (General Statutes § 53a-101 [a] [2]) and of unlawful restraint in the first degree (§ 53a-95 [a]). As to the charge of burglary, the information more particularly alleged that the defendant unlawfully entered the dwelling of Sarah Grove in New Canaan with intent to commit a crime therein and in the course of committing the offense did intentionally attempt to inflict bodily injury upon Mrs. Grove. As to the offense of unlawful restraint, the information more particularly charged that the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Diaz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- State v. EvansSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- State v. HafnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- State v. CianfloneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- State v. WaltonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- State v. FlemingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- State v. HaskinsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- State v. SiminoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- State v. CooperSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.