Hvolboll v. Wolff Co.
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtSiddoway, C.J.
¶1 — Edward Hvolboll appeals the summary judgment dismissal of his personal injury lawsuit against owners and contracted maintenance providers to the apartment complex where he lived and where he slipped and fell on accumulated ice and snow in January 2009. The trial court concluded that based on facts that were undisputed, any reasonable jury would conclude that his claim was barred by the doctrine of implied primary assumption of risk.
¶2 Mr. Hvolboll argues that the defense of implied primary assumption of risk does not apply to landlord-tenant cases involving falls on snow and ice; if it…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Hartley v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1985
- Folsom v. Burger KingWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Folsom v. Burger KingWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Grimwood v. University of Puget Sound, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1988
- Tincani v. Inland Empire Zoological SocietyWashington Supreme Court · 1994
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Leo Gleason v. Brian And Liza CohenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
- Reed-Jennings v. Baseball Club of Seattle, LPCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- Courtney A. Little & James S. Little v. Rosauers Supermarkets, Inc. dba/aka Super 1 FoodsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2022
- Hines v. Walmart IncDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2025
- Hvolboll v. Wolff Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.