Legal Opinion

Leo Gleason v. Brian And Liza Cohen

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided February 24, 2016No. 46398-9-IIPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMaxa, J.

¶1 Leo Timothy Gleason was injured by a falling tree while helping Brian Cohen cut down trees on Cohen’s property. The trial court granted Cohen’s motion for summary judgment, ruling that Gleason’s claim was barred by the doctrine of “implied primary” assumption of risk because he was aware of the risk that the particular tree he was cutting down could fall on him. Gleason appeals, arguing that the trial court improperly applied implied primary assumption of risk to bar his claim. Gleason argues that “implied unreasonable” assumption of risk, which does not operate as a complete bar to…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Tincani v. Inland Empire Zoological SocietyWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Keck v. CollinsWashington Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Scott v. Pacific West Mountain ResortWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Kirk v. Washington State UniversityWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Gregoire v. City of Oak HarborWashington Supreme Court · 2010

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Dunnington v. Virginia Mason Medical CenterWashington Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Brian Pellham v. Let's Go Tubing, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2017
  3. Dunnington v. Virginia Mason Med. Ctr.Washington Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Dunnington v. Virginia Mason Med. Ctr.Washington Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Jackson v. Live Nation Entertainment IncDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2022

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API