Legal Opinion

Ross v. Michael

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided July 6, 1923PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrosby, J.

These are actions of tort, tried together, for assaults alleged to have been committed by the defend*128ant. The plaintiffs are husband and wife, and at the time of the acts complained of were in the employ of the defendant — the husband as butler, the wife as cook.' A verdict was rendered for the plaintiff in each case.

The defendant excepted to the admission of certain evidence, to the refusal of the trial judge to give certain rulings requested, and to portions of the charge.

There was evidence offered by the plaintiffs tending to show that at about ten o’clock in the evening of December 8,1918,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WhiteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
  2. Miller v. CurtisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1893
  3. Smith v. HolcombMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
  4. State v. MitchellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  5. Morgan v. CurleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Davignon v. ClemmeyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
  2. Commonwealth v. SlaneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962
  3. Harrison v. Loyal Protective Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  4. Cohen v. Lion Products CompanyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1959
  5. Dahms v. Cognex Corp.Massachusetts Superior Court · 2000

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API