Legal Opinion
Davignon v. Clemmey
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided March 4, 2003No. 01-1862, 02-1293 and 02-1346PublishedCited by 126 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CYR, Senior Circuit Judge.
Defendants Karl D. Clemmey (“Karl”) and Karl D. Clemmey, Jr. (“Dan”) appeal from a district court judgment, entered following a jury verdict, directing them to pay $2,850,000 in damages to Neal Davignon, Patricia Kelley, and their two minor children, for intentional infliction of emotional distress, assault and battery, and various violations of their civil rights. In turn, Davignon and Kelley cross-appeal from a district court ruling that their jury verdict against Karl Clemmey, totaling $2,000,000, for intentional infliction of emotional distress, is barred by res…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Osterneck v. Ernst & WhinneySupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Agis v. Howard Johnson Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
- Thompson v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Marrero v. Goya of Puerto Rico, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by126 opinions
- Vicor Corp. v. Vigilant InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
- Marie v. Allied Home Mortgage Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
- Restoration Preservation Masonry, Inc. v. Grove Europe Ltd.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
- Jennings v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
- United Seniors Ass'n, Inc. v. Philip Morris USACourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
121 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.