Legal Opinion

State v. Mitchell

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 11, 1908PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Appeal from Hamilton District Court.— How. W. D. Evans, Judge. Defendant appeals from a conviction for assault with intent to commit great bodily injury, under which he was sentenced to pay a fine of $500, and, in default, stand committed to the county jail until such fine should be paid.—

1Opinion of the Court

McClain, J.—. 1. Assault with intent to do GREAT BODILY ' fic'iencyonn-dictment. I. The indictment charged that defendant willfully, maliciously, and unlawfully made an assault with a certain dangerous weapon, to wit, a shotgun, etc., which he pointed at the person assaulted, ' x ± ' and threatened to shoot said person “with intent to ¿o him great bodily injury.” By motion jn arrest of judgment, the defendant insisted in the trial court that the indictment was insufficient to support a conviction for the crime of assault with intent to do great bodily injury, and now complains of the…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. People v. KongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. State v. DonnellySupreme Court of Missouri · 1895
  3. State v. BlydenburgSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  4. State v. ShepardSupreme Court of Iowa · 1859
  5. Kunkle v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1869

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State v. PostSupreme Court of Iowa · 1963
  2. State v. BenzelNebraska Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Commonwealth v. HensonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1970
  4. State v. DammsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  5. State v. DicksonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API