Legal Opinion

Maurer v. Maurer

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided May 16, 2000No. C7-99-1319PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DANIEL F. FOLEY, Judge.

In its original May 14, 1999, judgment, the district court awarded appellant temporary spousal maintenance of $100 per month for one year. The parties moved for amended findings and appellant alternatively moved for a new trial. On June 28, the district court (1) issued amended findings of fact and conclusions of law; (2) awarded permanent spousal maintenance of $100 per month; and (3) denied appellant’s motion for a new trial. Appellant challenges the district court’s spousal maintenance award and its imputation of earning capacity income to appellant. Appellant…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Marriage of Rutten v. RuttenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  2. Marriage of Erlandson v. ErlandsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  3. Marriage of Nardini v. NardiniSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  4. In Re Trust Under Will of HoldenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
  5. In Re the Marriage of O'Brien v. O'BrienSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Maurer v. MaurerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
  2. Marriage of Passolt v. PassoltCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011
  3. Maurer v. MaurerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API