Legal Opinion
Maurer v. Maurer
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided March 22, 2001No. C7-99-1319PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAGE, Justice.
The sole issue presented in this marriage dissolution case is whether the trial court abused its discretion when it considered future tax consequences in valuing appellant Michael Maurer’s (“Maurer”) retirement assets. The trial court awarded respondent Rosemary Galvin (“Galvin”) (formerly known as Rosemary Maurer) property valued at $77,846 and Maurer property valued at $77,840. The award to Maurer included funds he held in three deferred compensation plans and one retirement plan. The trial court used the after-tax value of the four plans in calculating the value of the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Marriage of Rutten v. RuttenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- In Re Marriage of FonsteinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Hertz v. HertzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Johnson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Dodson v. DodsonAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Sveen v. MelinSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
- Marriage of Antone v. AntoneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- Marriage of Kampf v. KampfCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
- Marriage of Baker v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
- Marriage of Passolt v. PassoltCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.