Legal Opinion

Maurer v. Maurer

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 22, 2001No. C7-99-1319Published

1Opinion of the Court

623 N.W.2d 604 (2001)

In re the Marriage of Rosemary Ann MAURER, Respondent,

v.

Michael Patrick MAURER, Petitioner, Appellant.

No. C7-99-1319.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

March 22, 2001.

Thomas Zupanc, St. Cloud, for plaintiffs.

Kay R. Snyder, St. Cloud, for defendants.

Heard, considered, and decided by the court en banc.

OPINION

PAGE, Justice.

The sole issue presented in this marriage dissolution case is whether the trial court abused its discretion when it considered future tax consequences in valuing appellant Michael Maurer's ("Maurer") retirement assets. The trial court awarded respondent Rosemary…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Marriage of Rutten v. RuttenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  2. In Re Marriage of FonsteinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Hertz v. HertzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  4. Johnson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  5. Dodson v. DodsonAlaska Supreme Court · 1998

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API