Lusk Lumber Co. v. Independent Producers' Consolidated
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Kimball, Justice.
The respondent applies for a rehearing. It is again argued that the petition sufficiently alleges performance of the contract. Our attention is called to some allegations that were not mentioned in our former opinion. In alleging in the petition that Mr. Myrin’s approval of tbe work was wrongfully and unreasonably withheld, it was stated that his failure to approve the work was not due to any default, neglect or omission on the part of the plaintiff, or to any failure or refusal of plaintiff to comply with the provisions of the contract, or any failure on the part of the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Grover Irrigation & Land Co. v. Lovella Ditch, Reservoir & Irrigation Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1913
- Lusk Lumber Co. v. Independent Producers ConsolidatedWyoming Supreme Court · 1926
3Cited by7 opinions
- Buttrey Food Stores Division v. CoulsonWyoming Supreme Court · 1980
- Sagebrush Development, Inc. v. MoehrkeWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
- Claughton v. JohnsonWyoming Supreme Court · 1935
- Parkinson v. RobertsWyoming Supreme Court · 1958
- Lusk Lumber Co. v. Independent Producers Consol.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1931
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.