Grover Irrigation & Land Co. v. Lovella Ditch, Reservoir & Irrigation Co.
Wyoming Supreme Court
Error to the District Court, Laramie County; HoN. Roderick N. MatsoN, Judge. This was a proceeding for the condemnation of certain land in this state for a headgate and part of an irrigation ditch brought by the Lovella Ditch, Reservoir and Irrigation Company against the Grover Irrigation and Land Company. Judgment was rendered in favor of the petitioner and the defendant brought error. The material facts are stated in the opinion.
Read the full summary
Error to the District Court, Laramie County; HoN. Roderick N. MatsoN, Judge. This was a proceeding for the condemnation of certain land in this state for a headgate and part of an irrigation ditch brought by the Lovella Ditch, Reservoir and Irrigation Company against the Grover Irrigation and Land Company. Judgment was rendered in favor of the petitioner and the defendant brought error. The material facts are stated in the opinion. The only points desired to be presented arise upon the demurrer to the amended petition. The contention that said petition is insufficient is based uJ)on two…
1Opinion of the Court
Potter, Justice.
The Lovella Ditch, Reservoir and Irrigation Company, a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Colorado, brought this proceeding in the District Court in Laramie County by filing a petition with the clerk of that court to condemn certain land situated in this state owned by the Grover Irrigation and Land Company, a corporation also organized under the laws of Colorado, for the purpose of locating and maintaining thereon the headgate and part of the ditch of an irrigation system being constructed or about to be constructed by the plaintiff to divert water from Crow…
2Cases cited80 opinions
- Fallbrook Irrigation District v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Kohl v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Clark v. NashSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Bauserman v. BluntSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Teal v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Snell v. RuppertWyoming Supreme Court · 1975
- Adams v. Greenwich Water Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
- Hulse v. First American Title Co. of Crook CountyWyoming Supreme Court · 2001
- Arnold v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1957
- Coronado Oil Co. v. GrievesWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.