Legal Opinion

Masco Corporation v. Zurich American Insurance Company, Near North Insurance Agency, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided August 31, 2004No. 03-3071PublishedCited by 110 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROGERS, Circuit Judge.

The district court in this case refused to give effect to a broad arbitration clause in an insurance policy, where the underlying dispute between the parties revolved around policy coverage that neither party intended, but that was imposed on the contract by law as determined by subsequent Ohio Supreme Court opinions. Because the dispute nonetheless falls within the ambit of the arbitration agreement, we reverse.

Zurich American Insurance Company (“Zurich”), through its agent, Near North Insurance Agency, Inc. (“Near North”), sold to Masco Corporation (“Masco”) two…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Waffle House, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Westfield Insurance v. GalatisOhio Supreme Court · 2003

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by110 opinions

  1. Answers in Genesis of Kentucky, Inc. v. Creation Ministries International, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
  2. Seawright v. American General Financial Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  3. I. C. v. StockX, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021
  4. Joseph J. Simon v. Pfizer IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
  5. Glazer v. Lehman Bros IncCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005

105 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API