Glazer v. Lehman Bros Inc
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FORESTER, Chief District Judge.
The Defendants-Appellants appeal the District Court’s denial of their motion to compel arbitration. The District Court held that the arbitration provisions contained in five agreements between the Plaintiff-Appellee and the Defendants-Appellants were not enforceable because four of those provisions were fraudulently induced, based on oral representations made by a broker who worked for Appellants, and because a fifth agreement was superseded by subsequent criminal conduct and the other four agreements. We AFFIRM, in part, REVERSE, in part, and REMAND for…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Southland Corp. v. KeatingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by86 opinions
- Johnson Associates Corp. v. HL Operating Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- Jones v. U-Haul Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2014
- Watson Wyatt & Co. v. SBC Holdings, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Micrel, Inc. v. TRW, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- GGNSC Louisville Hillcreek v. Estate of Robert C. BramerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.