Legal Opinion

Glazer v. Lehman Bros Inc

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided January 12, 2005No. 03-4312, 03-4415PublishedCited by 86 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FORESTER, Chief District Judge.

The Defendants-Appellants appeal the District Court’s denial of their motion to compel arbitration. The District Court held that the arbitration provisions contained in five agreements between the Plaintiff-Appellee and the Defendants-Appellants were not enforceable because four of those provisions were fraudulently induced, based on oral representations made by a broker who worked for Appellants, and because a fifth agreement was superseded by subsequent criminal conduct and the other four agreements. We AFFIRM, in part, REVERSE, in part, and REMAND for…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Southland Corp. v. KeatingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by86 opinions

  1. Johnson Associates Corp. v. HL Operating Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
  2. Jones v. U-Haul Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2014
  3. Watson Wyatt & Co. v. SBC Holdings, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  4. Micrel, Inc. v. TRW, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  5. GGNSC Louisville Hillcreek v. Estate of Robert C. BramerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019

81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API