Legal Opinion

Hiles Co. v. Johnston Pump Co. of Pasadena

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided February 16, 1977No. 8142PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Batjer, C. J.:

Appellants sought to recover damages for economic losses allegedly caused by deficient equipment leased by respondent Mentzer Detroit Diesel (Mentzer) and a defective product manufactured by respondent Johnston Pump Company (Johnston) and sold by respondent Armstrong Brothers (Armstrong). Here, appellants contend the trial court erroneously granted respondents’ motion for summary judgment. We agree and remand the action for trial.

Appellants Harlan Hiles and Roger Hines formed a partnership to raise crops utilizing an irrigation system. To this end, Hiles…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Santor v. a & M KARAGHEUSIAN, INC.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
  2. Kassab v. SoyaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  3. Spence v. Three Rivers Builders & Masonry Supply, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Randy Knitwear, Inc. v. American Cyanamid Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1962
  5. Cova v. Harley Davidson Motor Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1970

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Groppel Co. v. United States Gypsum Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Flory v. Silvercrest Industries, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Hyundai Motor America, Inc. v. GoodinIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Matanky v. Gen. Motors LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2019
  5. Kinlaw v. Long Mfg. N.C., Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1979

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API