Flory v. Silvercrest Industries, Inc.
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
GORDON, Justice:
Appellees Paul and Vera Flory, plaintiffs below, brought this action seeking damages allegedly suffered during the purchase of a new mobile home, using as theories of recovery breach of contract and breach of warranty, intentional infliction of emotional stress, and fraud. Appellants, defendants below, are the mobile home manufacturer, Silvercrest Industries, Inc. (Silvercrest), its bonding company, Pacific Employers Insurance Company (Pacific), and the retailer, Char-Nanza, Inc., dba Alamo Mobile Homes (Alamo).
During a jury trial, the court granted directed verdicts in favor…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Seely v. White Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
- Santor v. a & M KARAGHEUSIAN, INC.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
- Nobility Homes of Texas, Inc. v. ShiversTexas Supreme Court · 1977
- Martin v. Julius Dierck Equipment Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Hauter v. ZogartsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- Szajna v. General Motors Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1986
- Wilks v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1997
- Rocky Mountain Fire & Casualty Co. v. Biddulph OldsmobileArizona Supreme Court · 1982
- Chin v. Chrysler Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
- Richards v. Powercraft Homes, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1984
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.