Legal Opinion

Hyundai Motor America, Inc. v. Goodin

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 22, 2005No. 82S05-0406-CV-279PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON PETITION TO TRANSFER FROM THE INDIANA COURT OF APPEALS; NO. 82A05-0308-CV-155.

BOEHM, Justice.

We hold that a consumer may sue a manufacturer for economic loss based on breach of the implied warranty of merchantability even if the consumer purchased the product from an intermediary in the distribution chain. There is no requirement of "vertical" privity for such a claim.

Facts and Procedural Background

On November 18, 2000, Sandra Goodin test drove a Hyundai Sonata at Auto-Choice Hyundai in Evansville, Indiana. The car was represented as new and showed nineteen miles on the odometer. Goodin…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. MacPherson v. . Buick Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  3. Spring Motors Distributors, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
  4. Kassab v. SoyaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  5. Daanen & Janssen, Inc. v. Cedarapids, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1998

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Clemens v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  2. In re Conagra Foods, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2015
  3. In re Nexus 6P Prods. Liab. Litig.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
  4. In re Myford Touch Consumer LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014
  5. The Care Group Heart Hospital, LLC v. Roderick J. Sawyer, M.D.Indiana Supreme Court · 2018

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API