Legal Opinion
Pell v. Weinstein
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 20, 1991No. 3:CV-88-1905PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
McCLURE, District Judge.
I. BACKGROUND
This action was commenced by plaintiffs on November 26, 1988. In response to the defendants’ motions to dismiss the complaint, plaintiffs filed an amended complaint on March 7, 1989, pursuant to Fed.R. Civ.P. 15(a). Once again, all of the defendants have filed motions to dismiss the complaint.
This action arises from the acquisition of PacStar Corporation, Inc., (“PacStar”), by a corporation known as Coated Sales, Inc., (“Coated Sales”). The plaintiffs, Richard Pell, James Miller and James O’Brien, were all shareholders in PacStar at the time of…
2Cases cited63 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Hospital Building Co. v. Trustees of Rex HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Michael E. Moss v. Morgan Stanley Inc., E. Jacques Courtois, Jr., Adrian Antoniu, and James M. Newman, Morgan Stanley Inc. And James M. NewmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Ralston Purina Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- In Re Refco, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- Kronenberg v. KatzCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2004
- Eli Lilly and Co. v. Roussel Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
- Koken v. SteinbergCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- In Re Electronic Data Systems Corp. "ERISA" LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2004
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.