Legal Opinion

Liakas v. State

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 1956PublishedCited by 835 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burnett

The plaintiffs in error were indicted, tried and convicted for receiving stolen property of the value of more than $60. For this offense the jury fixed their punishment at not more than seven years confinement in the State Prison. It is from this judgment that the plaintiffs in error have seasonably perfected their appeals. Excellent briefs have been filed on both sides and a very able argument heard on behalf of the plaintiffs in error. We have studied this record, the briefs and read all authorities cited and made quite an independent investigation, because of the particular interest…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Elliott Et Ux. v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Mays v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1921
  4. State v. CyrWashington Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Ford v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1945

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by835 opinions

  1. State v. BlandTennessee Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. DorantesTennessee Supreme Court · 2011
  3. State v. SmithTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
  4. State v. HansonTennessee Supreme Court · 2009
  5. State v. CarruthersTennessee Supreme Court · 2000

830 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API