Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 2000No. W1998-00156-SC-R11-CDPublishedCited by 1,275 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

OPINION

2Opinion of the Court · BarkerBarker, J.

in which ANDERSON, C.J., and BIRCH and HOLDER, JJ., joined.

In this appeal, we address whether prior inconsistent statements can be used substantively to corroborate a confession when the prior statements are admitted into evidence without objection. We also consider whether the failure of the trial court to instruct the jury as to the limited use of the prior statements constitutes plain error. The Court of Criminal Appeals held that prior inconsistent statements could not be used as substantive evidence and that the failure of the trial court in this case to give a limiting…

3Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. State v. CabbageTennessee Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Liakas v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1956
  4. State v. AdkissonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1994
  5. Momon v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 2000

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by1,275 opinions

  1. State v. CarruthersTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. RiceTennessee Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State v. WaltonTennessee Supreme Court · 2001
  4. State v. BanksTennessee Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Grindstaff v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 2009

1,270 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API