Legal Opinion
Mills v. Roto Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 5, 1926PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHinman, J.
The plaintiff, in the first count of his amended complaint, alleged a contract that the defendant “should employ the plaintiff for the period of one year and pay him for his services an annual salary of $3,500”; that this agreement was made in part by letter, attached to the complaint, and in part by a verbal agreement between the parties; and that the defendant, before the expiration of the year, discharged the plaintiff without just cause. A second count included in the complaint was abandoned on the trial.
The defendant demurred on the ground that it ap peared from the complaint and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Jordan, Marsh & Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1896
- Straus v. KazemekasSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1924
- Cohen v. . Berlin Jones Envelope Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1901
- O'Loughlin v. PoliSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1909
- Jacobson v. HendricksSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1910
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Kelly v. IvlerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Rutt v. RocheSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
- Gottesman v. Aetna InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Riverside Coal Co. v. American Coal Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
- Taylor v. DennehySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1950
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.